Go Back   Grim Dawn Forums > Off Topic > Totally Random

Notices

Closed Thread
 
Thread Tools Display Modes
  #11  
Old 06-26-2011, 10:53 AM
Father Squid's Avatar
Father Squid Father Squid is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Void(null) View Post
Small little piece of history for you. The Scottish Play is the shortest of Shakespeare's works but it was not always so. Back in the 1664 Sir William Davenant made a Musical out of it, with singing and dancing, flying witches and a great deal of spectacle. They cut out much of the dialogue to make room for all the songs and rewrote many of the characters including Lady Macbeth to be more fitting for this adaptation.

Well wouldn't you know the musical version was the only version to survive the passing of history? It wasn't until around 1750 that the Devenant adaptation fell out of favor but by that point the original version of had been lost to the passage of time...so they just cut the songs out of the Devenant version.

And this is how we have the Scotish play that we know and love today.
Really? There are still (at last count) 228 copies of Shakespeare's First Folio (constructed in 1621, printed in 1623) in existence... I'm sure the original can be pulled from there... unless that sneaky Devenant ran around and switched all the pages in those copies.....
  #12  
Old 06-26-2011, 11:01 AM
yerkyerk's Avatar
yerkyerk yerkyerk is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Holland
Posts: 4,246
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by i.n.s.a.n.e View Post
The biggest and the most costy/commercial theaters could live without the grants, but the small ones? They are just dead..And you will see no great stage plays, or the same actors in the biggest theaters, as it is not their style (meant for both sides)..It is not like they live on the grants, but it's a part of their essential budget. If they lose it, they will have to omit something (some plays, actors, sceneries, etc.) as they won't allow it, if they omit things even more they do compared to the greater theaters, less common people will come to see the stage plays there = the theaters will have less money, and will have to end up eventually.
Well, there's the thing, if it can't stand on its own, not enough people take interest in it. Everything works like that; if I like a particular type of food, but it's too costly to produce, almost nobody else wants is and I'm not prepared to donate an excessive amount of money to keep the production of that type of food going, the supermarkets aren't going to offer it - and the state shouldn't subsidize it. It works like this in all segments of the commercial world, I don't see why cultural exhibitions should be any different. After all, if it's subsidized by grants, the entire population pays for it, but only a small part benefits from it.

I'm with Scryer on this one; while you may not like the direction culture is taking, it still is culture. There's no such thing as a downfall of culture from an objective point of view.
  #13  
Old 06-26-2011, 11:06 AM
Father Squid's Avatar
Father Squid Father Squid is offline
Super Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 486
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Malpheas View Post
You can see the remaining text largely (well not all, of course, because of it's passage in time) in a collection works called the Apocrypha. Now, I don't know the validity of it all, but that's what I recall.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Llama8 View Post
My understanding was that the Council of Nicaea took the various books of the Bible & decided which would & would not be "in" the Bible, the ones being "out" would therefore be heretical, so I'm not quite sure it would be fair to say (or imply, at least that's what I took your post as meaning & appologies if you didn't mean it like that) that the Romans rewrote the Bible. 'Course I wasn't there & I've not exactly made much of a study of that time period (or the Bible), so feel free to completely ignore my post...
I'm not sure if I'd use the word rewrote... but instead go with the word translate...very few of the books of the Bible were written in Latin, so someone had to do a translation and a lot of things get lost as you from one language to the next...Another big translation occurs with the King James version which for years was the most widespread translation of the Bible - but there are a lot of others... And if you think about it, until the next Dead Sea Scrolls are found, which could contain more original text, or Apocryphal books, who knows what has been changed or left out...
  #14  
Old 06-26-2011, 03:00 PM
Void(null)'s Avatar
Void(null) Void(null) is online now
Champion
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: the act of locating; state of being located.
Posts: 1,802
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Father Squid View Post
Really? There are still (at last count) 228 copies of Shakespeare's First Folio (constructed in 1621, printed in 1623) in existence... I'm sure the original can be pulled from there... unless that sneaky Devenant ran around and switched all the pages in those copies.....
That's the story I was always told. Could just be Theater myth however, we do have so many.
__________________
Quote:
Originally Posted by medierra View Post
After Void(null) left there was basically no point anymore...

Last edited by Void(null); 06-26-2011 at 03:04 PM.
Closed Thread

Thread Tools
Display Modes

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 06:09 AM.


Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2013, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.